Thank you for contacting us. Here are the answer to your questions.

1. Yes, our software is compatible with QB Enterprise.

2. We would be installing the program on a network, is the Price per user a one-time fee? If we need to add more users, is it possible to add more after the fact?
Yes, you can purchase ezCheckPrinting for QuickBooks multiple user version. You can add more user by paying the price difference plus $5 fee to cover extra transaction cost.

There is no monthly fee, annually fee to use ezCheckPrinting.

3 Yes, ezCheckPrinting can support ulimited accounts with no extra cost. Many of our clients are accountants.

4. You need to select the account. Please view the Quick Start Guide to more details.

I would like to invite you download and try ezCheckPrinting QuickBooks version for free first, with no cost and no obligation.

Quick start guide - Please follow it to download and setup ezCheckPrinting
http://www.halfpricesoft...nt-quickbooks-checks.asp 

How to set up network version
http://www.halfpricesoft...s-check-over-network.asp 

FAQs
http://www.halfpricesoft...-check-printing-faqs.asp 

Please feel free to contact us if you still have any questions.

Thank you.

Casey
halfpricesoft.com

---

Good afternoon,

We are interested in your ezCheckPrinting QuickBooks Version. I have a few questions.
1. We currently use QuickBooks Enterprise. Is your product compatible with Enterprise?
2. We would be installing the program on a network, is the Price per user a one-time fee? If we need to add more users, is it possible to add more after the fact?
3. We have approximately 20 companies, with 1-2 bank accounts each. Will I need to set up each company (with it's corresponding bank accounts) in the program?
4. With the multiple accounts - when I select the ezCheck Printer in QuickBooks and it transfers the checks to the program, will I need to select the appropriate account, or will ezCheckprinting pull the information from QuickBooks (will it know which account I just wrote the checks from)?

I look forward to your response,

Denise